ins Houck pist let, & then in April 1897 sold,
the business to a Chimaman
this chalenged hänsachons took place
་
de c
1899.
(1) Jan. 1897 (2) 14903 awards.
(3)
10th Sept 1897
(4) March 1910
(1) Payment & Campiele's wages: My Hourk says that Campbell W. not serve Fangder the lunce
& intregment proprietor the bromers in theut
a garantie:
& strak ananged ting hum
monthly arecorrer
from Tang Kee
(2) Cashing cheques for Tang Kee
fase
Ang gay be paid and desace
exchange
Housh saxys
T.K paid cheques them in
exchange for open chiques or cash
A
IK
had to tanking account. He dit so cause the man who had formenty oblyed I.K. died
TK. came to heim is to had
m' 1903 got the bus meis from him. Housh specifical
dences having any other interest in the busmeis
(3)
Letter to Johnson on the hatchery's poper
>
(N
вже
scens to me
a very
it
dishonest
mable Johns
intended
your a Caucaissia- which he was no-
entiked
us of what was antically a bogos
advers
70
bitter is explanation is that Johnson
Who got a commission from the Amencan butter people had aheady obtained hunder o got Housh to with the latter (as apersonal freund (his) minder tenath him in draw his puke commission.
(4) Chint for a pass book boothin ice.
Housh pare it to othemise Thee it wit hat got credit to from the lee company
I must say
that Lam favourably impressed.
Norch's explanations which stake me as
straight forward: I think that (1) fas)
his statement
may come within the letter
16.
1
on
technically he was rendering assistance
but I don't think they infringe the
+
is
fruit. N° 3. inther debtful: it is a surais story the Gov. pross
wo ho
in arversing its probability: bat in
are it is 14 years old.
help
any
On the whole I see no meron to nopen
the question this dismissal.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.